Make (formerly Integromat) vs n8n
Which Is Better in 2026?
Quick Verdict
Make excels as a fully managed, cloud-based automation platform with 1000+ pre-built integrations and a gentler learning curve for business users, while n8n is the superior choice for organizations prioritizing data privacy, open-source transparency, and AI agent orchestration capabilities. Make's strength lies in rapid deployment with minimal infrastructure setup, whereas n8n's self-hosted option and 700+ integrations appeal to teams with technical expertise who need control over their data and custom workflows. For pure ease-of-use and breadth of integrations, Make has the edge; for flexibility and AI-native automation, n8n leads.
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Make (formerly Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Basic | $9.99/mo | $20/mo |
| Standard | $29.99/mo | $50/mo |
| Pro | $99.99/mo | Custom/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom/mo | — |
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (formerly Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Workflow Builder | ||
| App Integrations | 1000+ | N/A |
| Custom Webhooks | N/A | |
| Data Mapping & Transformation | N/A | |
| AI Functions | N/A | |
| Error Handling & Retry Logic | ||
| Team Collaboration | ||
| Execution History & Logs | ||
| API Access | N/A | |
| Encryption & Data Security | N/A | |
| 24/7 Support | Enterprise only | N/A |
| Free Trial | N/A | |
| Pre-built Integrations | N/A | 400+ |
| Custom Node Creation | N/A | |
| Self-hosted Deployment | N/A | |
| Cloud Hosting | N/A | |
| Webhook Support | N/A | |
| REST API | N/A | |
| Scheduled Workflows | N/A | |
| Role-based Access Control | N/A | |
| Open Source | N/A |
Pros & Cons
Make (formerly Integromat)
Pros
- Extensive app library with 1000+ pre-built integrations and growing
- Visual workflow builder with advanced logic, routing, and data transformation
- Powerful error handling and scenario debugging tools
- Competitive pricing with generous free tier and flexible execution-based billing
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than competing tools, especially for complex scenarios
- Can become expensive at scale with high monthly operation volumes
- Rate limiting on certain integrations and API endpoints
n8n
Pros
- Self-hosted option with fair-code license provides data control and transparency
- 400+ integrations and customizable nodes for extensive connectivity
- Visual workflow builder accessible to non-technical users
- Active community, regular updates, and competitive pricing
Cons
- Steeper learning curve for complex, multi-step workflows
- Performance limitations with large-scale or real-time operations
- Documentation gaps for advanced features and edge cases
Conclusion
Choose Make if you prioritize quick setup, extensive pre-built integrations, and minimal technical overhead—ideal for non-technical teams and SMBs. Choose n8n if you need self-hosting capabilities, AI agent features, open-source transparency, or operate in regulated industries where data residency matters. Make is the more accessible all-around platform, while n8n is better for technically-savvy organizations with specific compliance or customization needs.
See how Make (formerly Integromat) and n8n score across 6 dimensions
Pro members unlock full dimension breakdowns, PDF export, and premium stack insights.
Unlock Full Analysis — Start Free TrialFrequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Make (formerly Integromat) or n8n?
How much does Make (formerly Integromat) cost vs n8n?
What are the key differences between Make (formerly Integromat) and n8n?
Get More Comparisons
Want more matchups like this? Subscribe for new comparison insights.
Related Comparisons
ToolAudit may earn a commission when you visit a tool through our links. This never affects our scores or rankings. How we make money